The Agency for Accreditation Essay Sample free essay sample

The accreditation of curricular plans in the Philippines. peculiarly for province universities and colleges. is the chief map of the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines ( AACCUP ) . Inc. Organized in 1987. though officially registered and recognized under the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) on September 4. 1989. it is the youngest of the four ( 4 ) recognizing bureaus in the state until late 2003. Under its charter. one of the maps. if non the chief intent of AACCUP. is â€Å"to develop a mechanism of. and carry on the rating of plans and establishments. † AACCUP is now closely allied with the Association of Local Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation. Inc. ( ALCUCOA ) . organized merely in the ulterior portion of twelvemonth 2003. The AACCUP is a member of the: * National Network of Quality Assurance Agencies. Inc. ( NNQAA ) . formed by AACCUP and the Association of Local Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation. Inc. ( ALCUCOA ) . * Asia-Pacific Quality Network ( APQN ) with AACCUP as member of the Steering Group based in Hong Kong. China. * International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education ( INQAAHE ) based in The Hague. The Netherlands. THE Plan OF ACCREDITATION A. What is Accreditation?Accreditation is viewed as a procedure by which an establishment at the third degree evaluates its educational activities. in whole or in portion. and seeks an independent judgement to corroborate that it well achieves its aims. and is by and large equal in quality to comparable establishments. B. Program As the Unit of Assessment Presently. accreditation in province colleges and universities is by plan. A plan is defined as a class or a group of related classs packaged in a course of study and taking to a alumnus or undergraduate grade. Examples of plans are simple instructor instruction. civil technology. agribusiness. etc. AACCUP is now sing other theoretical accounts. like. recognizing by establishment as options to. or to complement plan accreditation. C. Other Properties Aside from being program-focused. accreditation is:1. based on criterions of the accrediting bureau. which are usually higher than those set by the Commission on Higher Education ( CHED ) and other appropriate bureaus. e. g. Professional Regulation Commission ( PRC ) . ; 2. volunteer on the portion of the higher instruction establishment that may desire to be accredited ; 3. an rating by equals. i. e. the external accreditors are largely faculty members from other higher instruction establishments ; and 4. non-governmental. BENEFITS OF ACCREDITATIONA. Plan that have passed the criterions. and are awarded accreditation position: 1. lend prestigiousness to member establishments. justified by the ownership of quality criterions and ceaseless attempts to keep them at high degree ; 2. aid parents to cognize which plan they may direct their kids to for quality instruction ; 3. make all those engaged in instruction aware of criterions of excellence which they should endeavor to achieve ; 4. make possible for those suggesting support and those who are to fund. to cognize what to back up and how much support is needed ; and 5. make possible for an evaluated plan to cognize its strength and failings. and in what aspects it needs to develop. B. Accreditation has besides been used as a standard in administrative decision-making in a assortment of ways: 6. appliers for learning in the Department of Education ( DepEd ) who are alumnuss of commissioned plans are granted recognition points ; 7. used as a standard in the grading of State Universities and Colleges ( SUCs ) ; 8. used as a standard in the choice of schools for foreign pupils ; 9. some bureaus consult AACCUP about the accreditation position of colleges and universities attended by their employees for intents of publicity ; and 10. sometimes foreign universities consult AACCUP sing the accreditation position of plans attended by Filipino pupils seeking admittance. C. In position of the failure of CHED Order No. 31 to supply benefits to SUCs. AACCUP has taken awareness of the undermentioned possible inducements to be granted to commissioned programs/institutions: 11. as a rational footing for budgetary petitions ; 12. for normative funding ;13. as a factor in the choice of Center of Excellence ( COEs ) and Center of Development ( CODs ) ; 14. for SUCs grading ;15. as a demand for the transition of a college to a university ; 16. as a factor in measuring the appointment/transfer of an SUC President ; and 17. for matching-fund strategies where demands for accreditation are matched with financess from CHED. THE CONDUCT OF ACCREDITATION A. Phases of AccreditationThe accreditation procedure passes through different stages/activities: Applicationan educational establishment files its application to undergo accreditation with AACCUP. Institutional Self-surveyupon blessing of the application. the applicant establishment will be required to do an internal appraisal by its internal accreditors to find the program’s preparedness for external reappraisal. Preliminary Survey Visit the rating of the plan for the first clip by external accreditors. Passing the appraisal entitles the plan to be awarded a Candidate position valid for two ( 2 ) old ages. 1st ( Formal ) Survey Visit the rating of the plan which has attained Candidate position. and if it has attained a higher degree of quality. is awarded a Level I Accredited position. good for three ( 3 ) old ages. 2nd Survey Visit involves the rating of an commissioned plan. and if it has passed the criterions set at a higher degree of quality than the instantly predating study visit. may measure up the plan to an award of Level II Re-accredited position. good for five ( 5 ) old ages. 3rd Survey Visit the accreditation phase conducted after a plan has enjoyed a Level II Re-accredited position for five ( 5 ) old ages. Passing a higher flat criterion of quality entitles the plan to use for Level III. The plan is so evaluated and must stand out in four ( 4 ) countries. viz. : 1 ) direction and 2 ) extension. which are compulsory ; and two ( 2 ) more countries to be chosen from among research. public presentation in licensure scrutiny. module development. and linkages. 4th Survey Visit is a higher degree which if hurdled. may entitle the establishment to an institutional accreditation position. A. Standards UsedThere are 10s ( 10 ) standards ( countries ) that are used in the appraisal of plans: 1. | Mission. ends and aims |2. | Faculty|3. | Curriculum and Instruction |4. | Students|5. | Research|6. | Extension and Community Involvement |7. | Library|8. | Physical Facilities |9. | Laboratories|10. | Administration|A. Accreditation InstrumentsThe rating instrument ( aide memoire ) which uses the 10 standards described above is the working usher of the Accreditor. Get downing with instruments for five ( 5 ) plans in 1992 ; so to ten ( 10 ) plans in 1994 ; there are now 34 ( 34 ) instruments which have undergone alteration for the first clip in twelvemonth 2000. These instruments were updated in 2003. 2005 and 2010. The instruments for the undermentioned plans are available: 1. | Accountancy| 18. | Fisheries| 2. | Agribusiness| 19. | Food Technology |3. | Agricultural Engineering | 20. | Forestry |4. | Agricultural Technology | 21. | Graduate Education | 5. | Agriculture| 22. | Graduate Teacher Education |6. | Agroforestry| 23. | Hotel and Restaurant/Tourism/Hospitality/Travel Management |7. | Architecture| 24. | Information Technology Education | 8. | Biology| 25. | Library A ; Information Science |9. | Business A ; Management Educ. | 26. | Mathematics/Applied Mathematics| 10. | Chemistry| 27. | Maritime Education |11. | Civil Engineering | 28. | Mechanical Engineering |12. | Computer Engjneering | 29. | Nursing|13. | Criminology| 30. | Nutrition A ; Dietetics |14. | Electrical Engineering | 31. | Office Administration | 15. | Electronics A ; Comm. Engineering | 32. | Physics/Applied Physics | 16. | Entrepreneurship| 33. | Undergraduate Teacher Education | 17. | Environmental Science | 34. | Veterinary Medicine | ACCREDITORS The existent accreditation study visits are conducted by squads of accreditors normally composed of five ( 5 ) members per squad per plan staying in the host establishment for a period of three ( 3 ) yearss. At present AACCUP has already trained over 900 senior module members with different specialisations from different province universities and colleges. More than 500 have qualified. and 323 are active members of the Pool of Accreditors. Output During the 18-year period ( 1992-2010 ) . AACCUP has accomplished: | 2008| 2009| 2010|Accumulative Number of Institutions Visited as of| 97| 98| 99| Accumulative Number of Programs Granted Accreditation Status as of| 1. 310| 1. 503| 1. 724| Out of the entire figure of 110 province universities and colleges ( SUCs ) . 105 ( 95 % ) are members of AACCUP ; 99 ( or 94 % ) of the members have already been reached by accreditation. PUBLICATIONS AACCUP publishes a professional diary and a paper:1. JournalJournal of Philippine Higher Education Quality Assurance – one-year ( in PDF format ) 2. AACCUP Newsletter – semi-annual ( in PDF format )* February 2011 ( 5. 94 MB ) * February 2010 ( 2. 9 MB ) * February 2009 ( 2. 05 MB ) * February 2008 ( 4. 3 MB ) * February 2007 ( 3. 35 MB ) * February 2006 ( 6. 19 MB ) * July 2005 ( 1. 29 MB ) * February 2005 ( 175 KB ) * August 2004 ( 924 KB ) * February 2004 ( 1. 39MB ) * January 2003 ( 1. 84 MB ) * October 2002 ( 664. 17 KB ) |